Phase 1: Planning and Risk Assessment
 
The audit process is a structured journey that begins with planning. Because an SAI cannot audit every line item, auditors use risk-based testing. They analyze the entity’s PFMIS transaction logs, past audit histories, and organizational changes to identify high-risk areas—such as capital project management or public payroll systems—where financial errors or corruption are most likely to occur.
Phase 2: Execution and Field Work
During execution, auditors gather sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support their conclusions. They apply specialized testing techniques:
  • Substantive Testing: Reviewing original vouchers, bank reconciliations, physical asset inspections, and supplier invoices to confirm transaction validity.
  • Analytical Procedures: Comparing current expenditure trends against past years or across similar departments to flag unusual financial spikes or anomalies.
Phase 3: Reporting and Management Letters
 
At the close of field work, the audit team drafts a Management Letter for the entity’s accounting officer. This document details all identified financial weaknesses, errors, and legal breaches. The accounting officer is given a strict window to submit formal written responses and explanations. The auditor reviews these responses before compiling the final audit report for parliament.

Â